Text classification is one of the most common applications of natural language processing (NLP). It is the task of assigning a set of predefined categories to a text snippet. Depending on the type of problem, the text snippet could be a sentence, a paragraph, or even a whole document. There are many potential real-world applications for text classification, but among the most common ones are sentiment analysis, topic modeling and intent, spam, and hate speech detection.
The standard approach to text classification is training a classifier in a supervised regime. To do so, one needs pairs of text and associated categories (aka labels) from the domain of interest as training data. Then, any classifier (e.g., a neural network) can learn a mapping function from the text to the most likely category. While this approach can work quite well for many settings, its feasibility highly depends on the availability of those hand-labeled pairs of training data.
Though pre-trained language models like BERT can reduce the amount of data needed, it does not make it obsolete altogether. Therefore, for real-world applications, data availability remains the biggest hurdle.
Zero-Shot Learning
Though there are various definitions of zero-shot learning1, it can broadly speaking be defined as a regime in which a model solves a task it was not explicitly trained on before.
It is important to understand, that a “task” can be defined in both a broader and a narrower sense: For example, the authors of GPT-2 showed that a model trained on language generation can be applied to entirely new downstream tasks like machine translation2. At the same time, a narrower definition of task would be to recognize previously unseen categories in images as shown in the OpenAI CLIP paper3.
But what all these approaches have in common is the idea of extrapolation of learned concepts beyond the training regime. A powerful concept, because it disentangles the solvability of a task from the availability of (labeled) training data.
Zero-Shot Learning for Text Classification
Solving text classification tasks with zero-shot learning can serve as a good example of how to apply the extrapolation of learned concepts beyond the training regime. One way to do this is using natural language inference (NLI) as proposed by Yin et al. (2019)4. There are other approaches as well like the calculation of distances between text embeddings or formulating the problem as a cloze
In NLI the task is to determine whether a hypothesis is true (entailment), false (contradiction), or undetermined (neutral) given a premise5. A typical NLI dataset consists of sentence pairs with associated labels in the following form:
Examples from http://nlpprogress.com/english/natural_language_inference.html
Yin et al. (2019) proposed to use large language models like BERT trained on NLI datasets and exploit their language understanding capabilities for zero-shot text classification. This can be done by taking the text of interest as the premise and formulating one hypothesis for each potential category by using a so-called hypothesis template. Then, we let the NLI model predict whether the premise entails the hypothesis. Finally, the predicted probability of entailment can be interpreted as the probability of the label.
Zero-Shot Text Classification with Hugging Face 🤗
Let’s explore the above-formulated idea in more detail using the excellent Hugging Face implementation for zero-shot text classification.
We are interested in classifying the sentence below into pre-defined topics:
topics = ['Web', 'Panorama', 'International', 'Wirtschaft', 'Sport', 'Inland', 'Etat', 'Wissenschaft', 'Kultur']
test_txt = 'Eintracht Frankfurt gewinnt die Europa League nach 6:5-Erfolg im Elfmeterschießen gegen die Glasgow Rangers'Thanks to the 🤗 pipeline abstraction, we do not need to define the prediction task ourselves. We just need to instantiate a pipeline and define the task as zero-shot-text-classification. The pipeline will take care of formulating the premise and hypothesis as well as deal with the logits and probabilities from the model.
As written above, we need a language model that was pre-trained on an NLI task. The default model for zero-shot text classification in 🤗 is bart-large-mnli. BART is a transformer encoder-decoder for sequence-2-sequence modeling with a bidirectional (BERT-like) encoder and an autoregressive (GPT-like) decoder6. The mnli suffix means that BART was then further fine-tuned on the MultiNLI dataset7.
But since we are using German sentences and BART is English-only, we need to replace the default model with a custom one. Thanks to the 🤗 model hub, finding a suitable candidate is quite easy. In our case, mDeBERTa-v3-base-xnli-multilingual-nli-2mil7 is such a candidate. Let’s decrypt the name shortly for a better understanding: it is a multilanguage version of DeBERTa-v3-base (which is itself an improved version of BERT/RoBERTa8) that was then fine-tuned on two cross-lingual NLI datasets (XNLI8 and multilingual-NLI-26lang10).
With the correct task and the correct model, we can now instantiate the pipeline:
from transformers import pipeline
model = 'MoritzLaurer/mDeBERTa-v3-base-xnli-multilingual-nli-2mil7'
pipe = pipeline(task='zero-shot-classification', model=model, tokenizer=model)Next, we call the pipeline to predict the most likely category of our text given the candidates. But as a final step, we need to replace the default hypothesis template as well. This is necessary since the default is again in English. We, therefore, define the template as 'Das Thema is {}'. Note that, {} is a placeholder for the previously defined topic candidates. You can define any template you like as long as it contains a placeholder for the candidates:
template_de = 'Das Thema ist {}'
prediction = pipe(test_txt, topics, hypothesis_template=template_de)Finally, we can assess the prediction from the pipeline. The code below will output the three most likely topics together with their predicted probabilities:
print(f'Zero-shot prediction for: \n {prediction["sequence"]}')
top_3 = zip(prediction['labels'][0:3], prediction['scores'][0:3])
for label, score in top_3:
print(f'{label} - {score:.2%}')Zero-shot prediction for:
Eintracht Frankfurt gewinnt die Europa League nach 6:5-Erfolg im Elfmeterschießen gegen die Glasgow Rangers
Sport - 77.41%
International - 15.69%
Inland - 5.29%As one can see, the zero-shot model produces a reasonable result with “Sport” being the most likely topic followed by “International” and “Inland”.
Below are a few more examples from other categories. Like before, the results are overall quite reasonable. Note how for the second text the model predicts an unexpectedly low probability of “Kultur”.
further_examples = ['Verbraucher halten sich wegen steigender Zinsen und Inflation beim Immobilienkauf zurück',
'„Die bitteren Tränen der Petra von Kant“ von 1972 geschlechtsumgewandelt und neu verfilmt',
'Eine 541 Millionen Jahre alte fossile Alge weist erstaunliche Ähnlichkeit zu noch heute existierenden Vertretern auf']
for txt in further_examples:
prediction = pipe(txt, topics, hypothesis_template=template_de)
print(f'Zero-shot prediction for: \n {prediction["sequence"]}')
top_3 = zip(prediction['labels'][0:3], prediction['scores'][0:3])
for label, score in top_3:
print(f'{label} - {score:.2%}')Zero-shot prediction for:
Verbraucher halten sich wegen steigender Zinsen und Inflation beim Immobilienkauf zurück
Wirtschaft - 96.11%
Inland - 1.69%
Panorama - 0.70%
Zero-shot prediction for:
„Die bitteren Tränen der Petra von Kant“ von 1972 geschlechtsumgewandelt und neu verfilmt
International - 50.95%
Inland - 16.40%
Kultur - 7.76%
Zero-shot prediction for:
Eine 541 Millionen Jahre alte fossile Alge weist erstaunliche Ähnlichkeit zu noch heute existierenden Vertretern auf
Wissenschaft - 67.52%
Web - 8.14%
Inland - 6.91%The entire code can be found on GitHub. Besides the examples from above, you will find there also applications of zero-shot text classifications on two labeled datasets including an evaluation of the accuracy. In addition, I added some prompt-tuning by playing around with the hypothesis template.
Concluding Thoughts
Zero-shot text classification offers a suitable approach when either training data is limited (or even non-existing) or as an easy-to-implement benchmark for more sophisticated methods. While explicit approaches, like fine-tuning large pre-trained models, certainly still outperform implicit approaches, like zero-shot learning, their universal applicability makes them very appealing.
In addition, we should expect zero-shot learning, in general, to become more important over the next few years. This is because the way we will use models to solve tasks will evolve with the increasing importance of large pre-trained models. Therefore, I advocate that already today zero-shot techniques should be considered part of every modern data scientist’s toolbox.
Sources:
1 https://joeddav.github.io/blog/2020/05/29/ZSL.html
2 https://d4mucfpksywv.cloudfront.net/better-language-models/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_learners.pdf
3 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.00020.pdf
4 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.00161.pdf
5 http://nlpprogress.com/english/natural_language_inference.html
6 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.13461.pdf
7 https://huggingface.co/datasets/multi_nli
8 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.03654.pdf
9 https://huggingface.co/datasets/xnli
10 https://huggingface.co/datasets/MoritzLaurer/multilingual-NLI-26lang-2mil7